 |
Published February 23, 2026 – Last reviewed February 23, 2026. |
Overview
Abrams Fensterman attorneys helped the Town of Harrison achieve a favorable outcome in an eminent domain trial involving the acquisition of a 122-acre golf course for public use. The property owners sought $42 million in additional compensation beyond the Town’s $13.65 million payment, but the court awarded approximately $6.96 million, far less than the owners’ claim. The case demonstrates how experienced eminent domain trial attorneys can successfully defend municipalities by presenting strong valuation evidence and limiting excessive compensation claims.
The attorneys played a key role in helping the Town of Harrison secure a favorable outcome in a high-stakes eminent domain trial involving the acquisition of a 122-acre golf course property for public recreational use.
Albert J. Pirro, Jr., Esq. and Lisa Colosi Florio, Esq. of Abrams Fensterman worked alongside Brody D. Smith, Esq. and Kathleen M. Bennett, Esq. of Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC as part of the trial team selected by the Town Attorney’s Office.
Their coordinated legal strategy helped the Town successfully defend its valuation position and significantly limit additional compensation claims.
Background: Town of Harrison’s Acquisition of Willow Ridge Country Club
In 2020, the Town of Harrison exercised its eminent domain authority to acquire the Willow Ridge Country Club property, a 122-acre parcel, for the public purpose of creating recreational facilities for residents. Eminent domain allows municipalities to acquire private property for public use, provided that the property owner receives fair compensation based on a professional appraisal and legal standards.
On June 17, 2021, the Town paid the property owners $13,650,000, based on an independent property appraisal. However, the property owners claimed the property was worth significantly more and sought an additional $42,000,000 in compensation through litigation, asserting a total value of $55,600,000.
Trial Outcome: Court Limits Additional Compensation
After a lengthy trial involving detailed valuation evidence, expert testimony, and legal arguments, the court awarded the property owners an additional $6,958,000. This represented approximately 16% of the owners’ $42,000,000 additional compensation claim. The decision confirmed that the Town’s original valuation approach was largely supported by the court and avoided a substantially higher financial impact on taxpayers.
Jonathan D. Kraut, Esq., who coordinated and supervised the trial on behalf of the Town Attorney’s Office, stated: “This decision is a huge win for the Town of Harrison. Years of preparation and hard work by lawyers, planners, and engineers contributed to this victory.”
Abrams Fensterman’s Role in Eminent Domain Trial Litigation
Trial attorney Albert J. Pirro, Jr., Esq. of Abrams Fensterman played a central role in presenting the Town’s case and defending its valuation analysis. Mr. Pirro described the outcome as a significant legal victory and noted that further legal proceedings may occur, including a potential appeal. He explained that the Town’s position remains that the additional compensation should be lower and that, if appealed, the Town may seek a further reduction.
This case highlights the importance of experienced eminent domain litigation attorneys who understand:
-
-
Property valuation disputes
-
Trial strategy and expert witness presentation
-
Municipal acquisition procedures
-
Court standards for determining just compensation
-
Why Eminent Domain Trial Experience Matters
Eminent domain cases often involve complex financial and legal issues, including disputes over property value, highest and best use, and appraisal methodology. Experienced trial attorneys help ensure that compensation determinations are based on objective evidence and legal standards, protecting public resources while respecting property owners’ rights. Abrams Fensterman’s involvement in this case demonstrates its ability to handle complex litigation involving municipal law, real estate valuation, and trial advocacy.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is eminent domain?
Eminent domain is the legal authority that allows government entities to acquire private property for public use, provided the owner receives fair compensation.
How is compensation determined in eminent domain cases?
Compensation is typically based on professional property appraisals, expert testimony, and court evaluation of the property’s fair market value.
Why do eminent domain cases go to trial?
Trials occur when the property owner and the government disagree on the property’s value and cannot resolve the dispute through negotiation.
How can an attorney help in eminent domain litigation?
An experienced eminent domain attorney can present valuation evidence, challenge opposing appraisals, and protect the client’s financial and legal interests during trial.